Radical media, politics and culture.

Blogs

early morning thought.

Bush and company want me to believe that because of the threat of terrorism, because "everything has changed" that the patriot act is necessary. You see, in these dangerous times we need to take some drastic measures. We have to give up some freedoms and be a little totalitarian in the face of this dangerous threat....

Then I started to think about how the US has just taken down one of the only non-islamic states in the Mid East.

That got me to thinking. If the patriot act is acceptable because of the threat we face from islamic fundamentalism, what the hell would we have to do to sustain a non-islamic government if we were Iraq.

What sort of Draconian tactics would bush and co decide were necessary if we lived the reality of having massive numbers of pro-fundamendalist population (ok, for the sake of this arguement ignore the fact that Bush actually represents the right wing religious fundamentalist faction). How closely would we resemble the oppressive regime of Sadam?

Does running a non-islamic govt in a society that is moving towards fundamentalism require a certain level of brutality? Did we really fuck up that badly, taking out the only thing standing between Iraq and yet another right wing fundamentalist regime? One that partly used brutal tactics to defend the idea of a secular society...

I mean think about it... what would we have to do, how brutal would we need to be to remove the religious fundamentalists out of political power in the US...

just a thought...

now for some coffee.

Are YOU a reactionary scum?

Some opportunist academic frustrations backed by cynicism to hide a degenerative intellectual backlash – the fall western Hegelian thought – the collapse of philosophy and science, i.e., sarcasm and decadence.

Revolutionaries don’t wait for the revolution they make it. We with the people make the revolution, first in some parts of the world, the most conscious, then the rest joins. We have all the answers to all the questions, but do you have the courage to apply them in the here and now. We wait for no one, we cause the revolutionary chain reaction and sooner or later it will pick up the rest of humanity.

We will liberate ourselves from capitalism and authority whether you like it or not. No masters, no gods no kings in anarchy, only free and equally happy people worldwide.

We destroy the system so no one could use it to enslave others. The termination of all systems by liberates humanity from systematic hierarchy and systematic authority. By ending the system we create a meta-system, i.e., the end of work and capitalism, the end of America and Israel as barbaric forces against their natural surrounding. Meta-system of anarchic self-management and self-creation will replace capital and punishment. The liberation movement of anarchic humanity

Free yourselves from limited past, rise and think the impossible, you are the revolution, and we are the revolution and nothing else. We are the objective conditions and we shell direct it/id to our own anarchic ends. Dare any one and suggest slavery or exploitation again, under whatever excuse or ideological mongering. We are here to stay and take the law and our destiny into our hands and make what we will with it and any reactionary reaction will be disposed off immediately.

Revolutionary step one: Appropriation of all means of social production = production for all. Elimination of the concept of control = freedom to all.

Revolutionary step two: Gift economy = meta-economy. Abolition of work = permanent creativity.

Especially to non-anarchists I really don’t know why you are at this anarchism forum, you are a sick person (an alienated mini capitalist) you should learn from us how to regain some of your lost humanity. Anyway go from here to where you belong, to your dear ex-slave owning country, and stay in right wing forums. I see your name spread on this board like a reject in your own neo-conservative circles. You are in the wrong forum and here you get demolished or transformed into being a more social being. But for now you are finished as a friend turning into foe.

Friends we are here to stay and navigate the revolution towards the anarchic society within our life span. Post revolutionary elimination of money and the distribution of all wealth on the basis of spontaneous and voluntary mega-production. As to the mini Darwinian capitalist, HE WANTS TO CHANGE, and get out of his self-imposed jungle. Anarchic society where biology don’t mix with ontology and neo-conservatives should be drastically transformed preferable by our like minded anarchist breaker of all laws, as a condition for further conscious advancement. Down with all the scientists and philosophers, long live the anarchic future. We are the most intelligent entity in space yet; we know what we want, anarchy and freedom.

I got an email invitation today from an old associate. He was inviting me to attend a $55 event where I could get the rare chance to see the founder of the Center for Nonviolent Communication.

It is a rare chance since this guy has only come to nyc once before in the past 20 years (I guess he is afraid of the big city or something ;)

Below is my rant on the subject of Non-violent communication...

In my opinion the ideas might be interesting but I will never get past the irresponsible re-definition of the important term violence.

Communication can be hostile and nasty and even abusive, but communication never cracked anyones bones.

Using the term violence to describe hostile communication is 100% irresponsible for activists.

To describe angry debate as violence; to even use the term "non-violent communication" degrades the meaning of the term violence in a very dangerous way.

At ABC No Rio, we bar members of our community that have committed acts of violence against another member of our community. If the term violence were to be altered as you are trying to do, such a policy would become meaningless and we would lose the ability as a community to defend ourselves from true violence.

When you walk into ABC No Rio, you can feel confident that it is a safe zone. You will be in a place that does not tolerate sexual or physical assault and violence. But you better walk in ready for real, honest and at times angry debate. That is just part of the reality of being an activist.

If we accept this definition of violence, then we have to accept and even approve of a bunch of demonstrators shouting at the police being called "violent demonstrators" by the media. We have to accept the police's definition of overturning trash cans as violence.

I refuse to accept such irresponsible use of such an important term.

Anarcho-Revolutionary Knowledge & Action

There is no escape but confrontation, creating the new within the old. We are the future makers; we are the foundation of the social revolution and the embryo of the future anarchic society. We are the revolutionaries who will terminate the state and capitalism, destroy hierarchy and class. We are building a new life, without coercion, authority or enforced labor. We have the solution and answers to all issues posed; we have no fear but endless courage and applicable anarcho-revolutionary knowledge. The people have woken up, they refuse to take it any more, they want freedom and equality now, and they want the anarchic global revolution – The New World Anarchy.

More and more people are joining the anarchic movement, everyday more and more youth are becoming anarchists and revolutionary. There are two reasons for this sudden expanding phenomenon (consciousness): 1) The accelerating deterioration of the objective condition of capitalism. 2) The appearance on the anarcho-historical scene some unique anarchists with an extraordinary energy and revolutionary ability. The numbers are increasing, the revolution is becoming nearer. Anarchists all over the world together with most of the people on earth will join hands in the making of this anarcho-social revolution for the creation of new egalitarian anti-capitalist - Free World – Free Humanity. Once people experience true freedom and material liberation they will all become the genius of humanity and the light at the end of the tunnel, living happily and free for ever after. Having a ripened objective condition is not sufficient on its own for the creation and manifestation of the anarchic social revolution. What is needed for this mass insurrection on a global scale to happen is some heroic revolutionary anarchists to pave the way when the masse are dormant. These exceptional anarchists act like catalysis for accelerating the social transformation and capitalist destruction, they are the social engine of change and the symbol of universal equity & liberty. The first to go by the end of this decade is the USA Empire, in delay of two decades after the fall of the USSR. The rest of the capitalist organizational structure will follow suit in time soon after. Humanity will free itself, for the first time ever, from this blood and sweet sucking parasite, called capital and its lackey’s. The revolution is coming and is coming fast; we are ready and fully prepared to change this world for the better forever. The anarcho-revolutionary movement for the liberation of humanity.

I was halfway through a rant about Penguin Day and the incredible need for a SAVE DRAFT option revealed itself once more. I can't keep a journal if I can't hit save. I think I was mumbling about eRiders and values-driven software decisions in a world where people can't even be bothered to do some basic values-driven lunch clean up. So we can't be bothered to sort our recycling, but we should all be using Mozilla Thunderbird?

So there. I had a ton of questions but they will have to wait.

I also had some things to say about Marxists in higher education. By the wayside. Save drafts.

well, this is a latenight bored ramble, having gotten totally sucked into the site and created a user account and everything, and bein recently encourage "to blog" more.. but mostly just to say "hi!" ;p

anyway, i gotta say folks- you've built a great collection of radical news, reviews, analysis here, and i just dropped by to check out abh's journal, but needed a user account (apparently, or else i didn't look hard enuf ;b) to find it.. and here i am, with a shiny new uid on yer nifty news site, sendin shoutouts to the nyc crew ;)

also, yer use of slash here is very well done, y'all- fast, full, navigable site with all the function of slashdot combined with all the intelligence and insight of the interactivist network..

myself, i've recently been converted to drupal, and haven't had major interaction with slashcode in some while, but i hafta say, info.interactivist is by far one of my favourite examples of a well setup news site using the esteemed SlashCode.

anyhow, that's enuf of my latenight ramblings- i'll post this, and then we'll see how long it takes me to do it ("blog it"?) again..

I think we decided this week that I will join the NOSI steering committee. Once upon a time, the Non-profit Open Source Intiative was this fantastical thing in the distance. While I was checking facts for House & Garden, there were kids out there actually getting paid to work with organizers, set up Linux desktops in Missouri, debate the merits--pragmatic and philosophical-- of open source software. And now I am smack in the middle of it, asking myself what NOSI ought to be.

(for the wishlist, a "save drafts" option!)

These are thoughts that I have: what are the ways in which Open Source Software matters (to non profits? at all?) How do those differ. Is there value in speaking pragmatically about vulnerability and reliability independant of the more basic values of collaborative development? I am interested in open source software because I believe that things can be accomplished collaboratively, and that intellectual property is a dangerous concept, one that does more harm than good (ahhh, like so many kinds of property ownership). In principle, it sounds nice to think that you own your ideas, but who has the power to use such ownership to their advantage?

There are a lot of solutions to that question, but one solution is to agree to give up your own exclusive rights in exchange for a guarantee that no one else can claim the same rights to that idea or piece of work.

I think that it is important to point out that part of hte reason people are willing to donate time to developing open source projects is that they know that no one can take it from them.

Today I missed the UFPJ March because I got talked into doing a workshop on "Using computers for garden outreach" for the Green Thumb Grow Together, the annual gathering of New York City's community gardening community.

I have been regretting saying yes for months now, but exactly four women showed up for my workshop, one brought her messed up mailing list to get it fixed (I showed her how to reset the borders in a table so that they are consistent) and all of them wanted to know how to make labels. It was a good reminder of how incredibly evil Micrsoft Office is, with all of that glossed over counter intuitive user interface, but also of what normal people want from computers.

Fun thing that I learned? Mailing labels don't work the same in Windows XP.

By Shayn Peitsch

”We were on the trains.” Sign held by a Spaniard at a rally in Madrid against the terror bombings

The bombings in Spain this week have gotten me to think a bit more deeply on the current progressive stance in the world. Remembering back to September 11th, 2001 and the terrorist attacks in the U.S., the reaction of the Spanish people mark a divergence from the path taken by the U.S. administration. The U.S. simply declared their anger and asked for vengeance; this seems quite in line with how governments for the rich operate. The hastily thought out plans of Curious George and Co. was acceptably enough at the time to give them a blank check to use it’s full power to really change the world.

Of course, the consequences of the U.S.’s actions are well known. Al-Quada still survives and is a potential suspect in the Spanish bombings. Afghanistan belongs to the Middle Ages, Saddam is out of power and Iraq is in flames. Thousands of people have been killed, millions have been effected very directly by this policy in a horrible way; not to mention the assault on the U.S.’s own freedoms and security. And so the list goes on.

The reaction of the Spaniards thus far does not seem to co-operate with that line of thinking to date. Viewing the marked difference of the Spanish reaction so far, I can say that the outcome will be fundamentally different; this is because it’s coming from a different place. Just last night, millions of Spaniards marched in solidarity against the bombings. Of course they are angry and demanding action. However, they are also calling out for justice. True justice. Thousands painted their hands and held them up for the world to see. A sign of peace, the same sign they used when they declared their opposition to the war against Iraq last spring.

Their president, Jose María Aznar, who led a reluctant Spain into the U.S.’s war on terrorism, was at the head of the main rally in Madrid. I’m feeling that he’s going to win tomorrows election, and use this to build his case for supporting the U.S., which was shown to be against the wishes of the Spanish people, who rose against the war in Iraq last year in an overwhelming majority (some 90%). It truly baffles me how these terrorist attacks always come at the best of times for right-wing conservatives, despite their horrible record against terrorism.

I hope, though doubt, that the progressive response of so many Spaniards will change Spain’s attitude and policies on the war on terrorism. What the world needs now more than anything is whole nations collectively stating a very declarative and assertive “no!” to pre-emptive war, coupled with establishing a clear U.N. mandate on fixing the holes left behind by the U.S. war machine in such countries as Afghanistan and Iraq. Not to mention help countries forgotten by the US, like Haiti and Libya, who U.S. foreign policy has left out of it’s planning in our brave new world after a century of interference. Spain can show the world how to deal with terrorism properly – by acting like morally driven people, and leaving behind the pettiness and willful blindness of war, terrorism and revenge. The Spanish government can easily get the support of the world, and more importantly, that of the Spanish people, to find out who committed this horrendous crime and act appropriately. This is going to be a pivotal moment in seeing how Spain will contribute to either the progressive world of democracy, consensus, and justice, or the much darker side of humanity, that of resentment, fear and anger; the new unspoken beacons of capitalism and top-down, nation-state for the rich democracies.

The reason I see two paths for Spain is because everyone is so actively destroying any middle ground and thrusting world opinion into two equally reactionary camps. This hurts our progressive movement, but it strengthens our arguments considerably by providing fertile grounds of proof and evidence created by the disasters wrought on all fronts by western societies belief that we must change the world to fit our imperialistic view of it. Each day, I see only new reasons why we’re correct to stand on our moral grounds and denounce predatory capitalism, right-wing intervention and corporate greed. The growth of inequalities and the backward steps have far out-paced our abilities to denounce them.

Which means the icing on the cake was put into place a long time ago. We know that the current systems in our respective nations and the growing ineffectiveness of the U.N. is proof enough that they can no longer lead this world forward. I’m sure many of us are wondering why our numbers do not swell in accordance with the facts. With each failed policy, shouldn’t more people realize that our world needs a new vision, and the one envisioned by our intellectuals is that very vision?

Well, no. We cannot possibly expect our moral and political stance alone to overcome the onslaught of the popular, global corporate media. Our responsibility is not to be the reactionary left-wing camp. Rather, we are the voice for the 90% of the planet who is not rich. When tragedies like the Spanish bombings happen, it’s up to us not only to say we denounce the policies which created the deadly situation and the horror that is almost sure to follow by the quick fix of retribution and revenge, but also that we were on those trains when the bomb exploded. The death of innocent civilizations isn’t fodder for our argument; it’s the death of people we’re supposed to protect.

The murder of hard-working, innocent and average people was caused in part because we failed to convince the world of our vision, especially when we know that we have the mentality and the ideas to step the reasons of terrorism. We are the alternative view not because our view is different, but because we reflect what is just and truthful. Our intellectuals have shown us our clear path to the world we say we want, and when tragedies like this are born out of policies like the war on terrorism (as it just may turn out), which we so venomously denounce, we must reassess the reasons why the world still does not heed our call to realign our stance and policies in world affairs.

If we have chosen the idea that we want leaders, not rulers, than so be it. After the period of mourning the victims of terrorism deserve, we must look at how we, as progressives and activists are trying to create the visions of our dreamers, and change or reaffirm our actions as necessary. As March 20th, the first anniversary of the second Iraq war approaches, we must take our global plans to restate our goals and opposition and use such an event to also declare that 2004 will be different, because we are going to take the last few incredible years and use them as the basis for another year of hard work and activism for the sake of justice and progress. Progress doesn’t mean being “the other side,” if we’re going to be successful; it has to mean working towards the world that already exists and deserves it’s chance to bring about a better day. The Spanish reaction thus far should tell us it resides in the hopes and dreams of the people.

With our raised, painted hands, let’s renew our vow to be the servants of our dreams, and the masters of our realities.

"When I despair, I remember that all through history the way of truth and love have always won. There have been tyrants, and murderers, and for a time they can seem invincible, but in the end they always fall. Think of it ... always." Mahatma Gandhi

Shayn Peitsch

Realizing that bugtracking is different from user instructions, and that I actually said I would work on writing user instructions, I think this warrants a sep. journal entry.

I have some questions, there are some things that I have figured out, but frankly it took me a bloody long time to figure out how to just go read hydracist's journals. A lot of pieces of the navigation are not so super clear to me, the idea was to digest and compose in one fell swoop. As I embark on that process, I welcome questions as well as answers. For now mostly questions, though.

I see two pieces to this project: a somewhat more encompassing mission statement about what the site is here for, and docs that explain what is going on in the menus, how to post, how to journal, how to use the more advanced social network features,etc.

Some feedback on the site itself is welcome, too.

Pages

Subscribe to RSS - blogs