Radical media, politics and culture.

Snufkin Moomintroll of Daybreak Anarchist Collective and a couple of anonymous comrades have submitted an article titled "Viva Anarquia! A North American Anarchists account of Barcelona anti EU mobilizations!"


Read the article and comments on infoshop.org

the intro is printed below:


It´s difficult to sum up in one statement all the stuff that´s been happening in Barcelona during the last week of mobilizations that led to Sundays manifestation of 500,000 people, the largest anti-globalization march in our movements history. The momentum has been noticably building for a month; posters and graffiti spontaneously appearing, newspapers buzzing of police plans and presence, media threats that dangerous foreign agitators are coming to Barcelona (that´s us!), and much more. In the last week before the summit the police presence of 8,500 smothered the city, and later in the week shut down major streets, transportation, and neighborhoods in order to safeguard the summit (yes, again they had to meet in an occupied zone). Homeless people were cleared out of sight, young people were cleaned from the streets and plazas, and some parts of inner barcelona became a surreal playground of militarized police and tourists in bad shirts. Yes, the name Franco was mentioned more then once.

Thomas Seay writes: Here is my translation of Casarini's surprizing statement on the Biagi assasination. Please
circulate. The original can be found at:
Casarini

To All Civil Society by Luca Casarini

(translated from the Italian by Thomas Seay)

What happened in Bologna is a horrible pro-regime homicide. I reaffirm this and I will continue to state this with all my might along with thousands and thousands of people, knowing that this thought is shared by a lot of people.

What does this mean? It means that it is not the "terrorism", as the term is being used, of a previous time in this country.
Nor is it the "strategy of tension", which was inaugurated in 1969 with a state-planted fascist bomb in Piazza Fontana. Those two settings were completely different from today, as were the culture, the political and social climate in Italy as in the rest
of the world. The needs of the various state apparatus were different, the "field of action", the nation-state was different. The thinking of thousands of youth, who wanted to fight with arms, was different.

Michael Hardt, "Rather Barbarism Than Socialism!"

An Interview with Sweden's Arbetaren

A conversation with Michael Hardt about immaterial labor, the role of labor unions, barbarism vs. socialism, and how to formulate "actively pedagogical" demands, from this week's issue of the Swedish Syndicalist weekly Arbetaren.


It's really not too common that a brick-sized, theory-filled communist book gets so widely discussed as Empire – a globalization-bible turning many traditional conceptions of what the left "should" think about globalisation, the state and socialism upside-down. The book has received both praise and criticism from unexpected directions. Arbetaren met Michael Hardt, one of the authors, for a talk about Empire and multitude, barbarism and socialism, immaterial labor and the role of unions.


john perry barlow writes "The Accra Manifesto
Accra, Ghana
Tuesday, March 12, 2002 (revised Wed. March 13, 2002)


Since its beginnings, Cyberspace has provided new approaches for the
benign ordering of human affairs. As we begin to develop institutions
to govern the digital world, we must avoid returning to industrial
models that have generally failed in the analog world to assure
equity, liberty, and human inclusion. Instead, let us build upon the
promise of what has already proven effective in this social
experiment.


Excerpt from March 2002 issue of Barricada, Agitational Monthly of the
NorthEastern Federation of Anarcho-Communists.


The following is our response to issues raised by the "Open Letter to Those
Involved in the Black Bloc", printed in Volume 2, issue #12 of Willful
Disobedience, as well as to a lot of criticisms and issues that arose on the
Infoshop.org newswire discussion around this letter. The response is not as
complete, or necessarily well structured, as we would have hoped, due to
time constraints, but we do feel that it goes a long way towards correcting
some of the misconceptions around our idea of what black blocs should be,
what purposes they serve, when they are of use, how they should be
organized, etc.


Anonymous Comrade writes "Scientific American, April 2002
full: http://www.sciam.com/2002/0402issue/0402bales.html


The Social Psychology of Modern Slavery


Contrary to conventional wisdom, slavery has not disappeared from the
world. Social scientists are trying to explain its persistence


By Kevin Bales


For Meera, the revolution began with a single rupee. When a social worker
came across Meera's unmapped village in the hills of Uttar Pradesh in India
three years ago, he found that the entire population was in hereditary debt
bondage. It could have been in the time of their grandfathers or
great-grandfathers--few in the village could remember--but at some point in
their past, the families had pledged themselves to unpaid labor in return
for loans of money. The debt passed down through the generations. Children
as young as five years old worked in quarry pits, making sand by crushing
stones with hammers. Dust, flying rock chips and heavy loads had left many
villagers with silicosis and injured eyes or backs.


Calling together some of the women, the social worker proposed a radical
plan. If groups of 10 women agreed to set aside a single rupee a week from
the tiny sums the moneylenders gave them to buy rice, he would provide seed
money and keep the funds safe. Meera and nine others formed the first
group. The rupees slowly mounted up. After three months, the group had
enough to pay off the loan against which Meera was bonded. She began
earning money for her work, which greatly increased the amount she could
contribute to the group. In another two months, another woman was freed;
the following month, a third came out of bondage."

David McReynolds writes

"A Thousand Coffins at the United Nations


Mar 19, 2002


Let's see if I can pull the words out at this hour, and
write this in one flow.


Today, shortly after 1 p.m., I got to Dag Hamaskold
Plaza near the United Nations, to look at the "Coffin
Display" arranged by Israeli and Palestinian Bereaved
Families for Peace. (Two groups cooperated in this
project, the Parents' Circle of 200 families in Israel
and National Movement for Change in the Palestinian
Authority).

Electoral Landslide in Holland

Joost van Steenis

Fast change occurs.

We had in The Netherlands a stable political system in which the big traditional parties formed coalitions to rule the country. It seemed this this could go on for ages. But the last Town Council elections proved that people can suddenly change their minds. It is not yet a catastrophe but
nevertheless is again proved that stability is not eternal, that unexpected
things can happen.

Chuck0 writes

The Stars & Stripes: Killing for the Flag

Alternative Press Review,Vol 7, No.1/Spring 2002

The U.S. is the only nation-state to have been condemned by the World Court
for international terrorism.

The U.S. vetoed a UN Security Council
resolution calling on governments to observe international law. After
deliberately targeting the civilian public health infrastructure, the U.S.
military imposes a continuing economic blockade on Iraq which has directly
resulted in the deaths of hundreds upon hundreds of thousands of children.
The U.S. government is the primary financier and arms supplier for the
decades-long Israeli war against the entire Palestinian people. The U.S.
armed forces and U.S. organized and/or financed ally or proxy forces have
killed millions upon millions of civilians since the end of World War II.
This is the not-so-hidden meaning of the Stars and Stripes as the vast
majority of people around the world understand it.


jim writes: I saw this on the web, it is worth a read:

"The New Empire Loyalists


Former Leftists Turned US Military Cheerleaders Are Helping Snuff Out Its Traditions of Dissent"


Tariq Ali

Saturday March 16, 2002, The Guardian


Exactly one year before the hijackers hit the Pentagon, Chalmers Johnson, a distinguished American academic, staunch supporter of the US during the wars in Korea and Vietnam, and one-time senior analyst for the CIA, tried to alert his fellow-citizens to the dangers that lay ahead. He offered a trenchant critique of his country's post-cold war imperial policies: "Blowback," he prophesied, "is shorthand for saying that a nation reaps what it sows, even if it does not fully know or understand what it has sown.


"Given its wealth and power, the United States will be a prime recipient in the foreseeable future of all of the more expectable forms of blowback, particularly terrorist attacks against Americans in and out of the armed forces anywhere on earth, including within the United States."

Pages