You are here
Announcements
Recent blog posts
- Male Sex Trade Worker
- Communities resisting UK company's open pit coal mine
- THE ANARCHIC PLANET
- The Future Is Anarchy
- The Implosion Of Capitalism And The Nation-State
- Anarchy as the true reality
- Globalization of Anarchism (Anti-Capital)
- Making Music as Social Action: The Non-Profit Paradigm
- May the year 2007 be the beginning of the end of capitalism?
- The Future is Ours Anarchic
Gary Younge, "Bushies Will Retain Root Controls"
July 7, 2005 - 10:49am -- jim
"Bush Administration To Keep Control
of Internet's Central Computers"
Gary Younge,
The Guardian
The Bush administration has decided to retain control over the principal computers
which control internet traffic in a move likely to prompt global opposition, it was
claimed yesterday. The US had pledged to turn control of the 13 computers known as
root servers — which inform web browsers and email programs how to direct internet
traffic — over to a private, international body. But on Thursday the US reversed
its position, announcing that it will maintain control of the computers because of
growing security threats and the increased reliance on the internet for global
communications. A Japanese government official yesterday criticised the move,
claiming it will lend momentum to the debate about who controls the information
flow online.
"When the internet is being increasingly utilised for private use, by business and
so forth, there is a societal debate about whether it's befitting to have one
country maintaining checks on that ... It's likely to fuel that debate," said
Masahiko Fujimoto, of the ministry of internal affairs and communications' data
communications division. The computers serve as master directories that contain
government-approved lists of the roughly 260 suffices used, such as .com or .co.uk.
Anyone who uses the web interacts with them every day. But a policy decision by the
US could, at a stroke, make all sites ending in a certain suffix unreachable.
Despite many doomsday scenarios, the most recent US decision will have little if
any immediate effect on internet users, and given the internet's anarchic nature it
may simply represent a desire to assert state control even when it is not possible
to do so. Claudia Bernett, 32, a digital design analyst in New York, said: "Scary
as it seems, because of the nature of the internet, I think they'll be hardpressed
to create a coherent system that is capable of the kind of monitoring they hope for
...
Eventually, the people participating in the system will find the technological
means to evade the watchful eye." Experts say that in the worst-case scenario,
countries that refused to accept US control of the main computers could establish
their own separate domain name system, with addresses in some places that others
would not be able to reach, making the world wide web give way to discrete,
regional web domains. Mr Fujimoto said that is also unlikely because of its
complexity, but the US decision will raise serious concerns that will not be
assuaged easily. The announcement comes just weeks before a UN panel is set to
release a report on internet governance. Some nations want international oversight
of the issue but historically the US has maintained the role because it was such a
key player in the early years of the internet's development.
"Bush Administration To Keep Control
of Internet's Central Computers"
Gary Younge,
The Guardian
The Bush administration has decided to retain control over the principal computers
which control internet traffic in a move likely to prompt global opposition, it was
claimed yesterday. The US had pledged to turn control of the 13 computers known as
root servers — which inform web browsers and email programs how to direct internet
traffic — over to a private, international body. But on Thursday the US reversed
its position, announcing that it will maintain control of the computers because of
growing security threats and the increased reliance on the internet for global
communications. A Japanese government official yesterday criticised the move,
claiming it will lend momentum to the debate about who controls the information
flow online.
"When the internet is being increasingly utilised for private use, by business and
so forth, there is a societal debate about whether it's befitting to have one
country maintaining checks on that ... It's likely to fuel that debate," said
Masahiko Fujimoto, of the ministry of internal affairs and communications' data
communications division. The computers serve as master directories that contain
government-approved lists of the roughly 260 suffices used, such as .com or .co.uk.
Anyone who uses the web interacts with them every day. But a policy decision by the
US could, at a stroke, make all sites ending in a certain suffix unreachable.
Despite many doomsday scenarios, the most recent US decision will have little if
any immediate effect on internet users, and given the internet's anarchic nature it
may simply represent a desire to assert state control even when it is not possible
to do so. Claudia Bernett, 32, a digital design analyst in New York, said: "Scary
as it seems, because of the nature of the internet, I think they'll be hardpressed
to create a coherent system that is capable of the kind of monitoring they hope for
...
Eventually, the people participating in the system will find the technological
means to evade the watchful eye." Experts say that in the worst-case scenario,
countries that refused to accept US control of the main computers could establish
their own separate domain name system, with addresses in some places that others
would not be able to reach, making the world wide web give way to discrete,
regional web domains. Mr Fujimoto said that is also unlikely because of its
complexity, but the US decision will raise serious concerns that will not be
assuaged easily. The announcement comes just weeks before a UN panel is set to
release a report on internet governance. Some nations want international oversight
of the issue but historically the US has maintained the role because it was such a
key player in the early years of the internet's development.