Noam Chomsky, MIT Linguist, Critiques U.S. Foreign Policy

Jonathan Curiel, San Francisco Chronicle, March 18, 2002

When Noam Chomsky takes the stage today at the University of
San Francisco to give a speech titled "Human Rights: Global
Change and Continuity, " he'll be greeted by an audience
that sees him as the antidote to U.S. leaders who back the
military campaign in Afghanistan and want to expand the war
on terrorism to Iraq and other countries.

Chomsky, the noted MIT linguistics professor who is best
known for his scathing critiques of U.S. foreign policy,
says the United States itself was practicing terrorism when
it bombed Afghanistan and forced the Taliban from power. And
it was terrorism, Chomsky says, when President Bush --
without publicly providing conclusive proof, and without
going to an international court of law -- decided he wanted
Osama bin Laden "dead or alive."

"By the U.S. definition, those are textbook illustrations of
international terrorism, which is the use of force or
violence to attain political ends (and) the targeting of
civilians through intimidation and fear," Chomsky said in a
weekend phone interview from his Massachusetts home, before
flying to the Bay Area to make a weeklong series of talks.

Since Sept. 11, Chomsky has been deluged with requests to
speak at universities, fund-raisers and public forums. He
published a best-selling book, 9-11, which explains -- in
a series of interviews with journalists -- his view that the
United States is "a leading terrorist state" that
circumvents international law and wrongfully supports
murderous conditions around the world, whether it's in Iraq,
the Palestinian territories, Nicaragua or Indonesia.

"Right now, the United States is asking Turkey to become the
international military force in Afghanistan," said Chomsky.
"Well, what's Turkey? In the 1990s, funded almost completely
by the Clinton administration, atrocities increased (in
Kurdish areas of Turkey) -- to the point that (up to 3
million) refugees were driven out and maybe 50,000 people
were killed and thousands of villages were destroyed. That's
U.S. terrorism in the 1990s. I'm not talking about ancient
history. And now Turkey is being asked to supervise the 'war
on terrorism?' If some Martian observer were looking at
this, he'd crack up in ridicule."

Critics say Chomsky is reflexively anti-American, and
publications as varied as the New Republic and the Weekly Standard have derided his post-Sept. 11 comments, especially remarks Chomsky made last November in Pakistan's capital, when he reportedly told an audience, "The coalition forces are making plans to further destroy the hunger-stricken country (of Afghanistan). The consequences of their crimes will never be known and they are quite confident about that."

Under the title of "Paging Jane Fonda," the New Republic
wrote that Chomsky "appeared in Islamabad to peddle his by
now banal theories of American malfeasance" and that, "At
the end of his speech, the audience of 1,500 gave Chomsky a
standing ovation. He'd doubtless receive a similarly warm
reception in Kandahar."

Chomsky dismisses his critics as "commissars," saying he
takes their put-downs "for granted. It's been done
throughout history. How were dissidents treated in the
Soviet Union? Let's look at the First World War. The first
thing that happened as the war opened was that 93 leading
German intellectuals issued a proclamation requesting that
intellectuals all over the world support Germany's noble war
effort. On the Anglo-American side, exactly the same thing
happened. There were a couple of dissidents, like (author
and philosopher) Bertrand Russell and (Socialist
presidential candidate) Eugene Debs in the United States --
and, yes, they ended up in jail."

His speech in Islamabad, Chomsky points out, was arranged by
Pakistan's Eqbal Ahmad Foundation, "and Eqbal Ahmad was the
leading opponent of religious fundamentalism and nuclear
armament in Pakistan. He was also the leading proponent of
democracy. That's who I was speaking for -- for the group of
people who are radically opposed to Islamic fundamentalism.
The liberal press (in the United States) presented it as if
I was somehow giving a pro-Taliban speech."

Tomorrow and Wednesday, Chomsky will give speeches on
linguistics at UC Berkeley's Zellerbach Hall. Then he'll
talk Thursday night at the Berkeley Community Theatre in a
benefit for the Middle East Children's Alliance, and Friday
night at the Hyatt Hotel in Palo Alto in a sold-out discussion sponsored by the Peninsula Peace and Justice Center. Chomsky's Thursday night speech is titled "Middle
East Peace in a 9-11 World," and his Friday night speech is
titled "Peering Into the Abyss of the Future." All of his
talks, including today's, will touch on Afghanistan and a
war against terrorism that he says is morally unfair and
misdirected.

Since Sept. 11, Chomsky says, his speeches have been more
heavily attended than ever, and his views have been
disseminated more than ever.

"It's not just me, incidentally," Chomsky said. "It's everybody. There's probably been more openness and dissent now than at any time in modern history. "