You are here
Announcements
Recent blog posts
- Male Sex Trade Worker
- Communities resisting UK company's open pit coal mine
- THE ANARCHIC PLANET
- The Future Is Anarchy
- The Implosion Of Capitalism And The Nation-State
- Anarchy as the true reality
- Globalization of Anarchism (Anti-Capital)
- Making Music as Social Action: The Non-Profit Paradigm
- May the year 2007 be the beginning of the end of capitalism?
- The Future is Ours Anarchic
NYC Sues to Stop Critical Mass Bike Rides
November 1, 2004 - 12:00pm -- amanda
NYC Sues to Stop Critical Mass Bike Rides
New York City filed a lawsuit today in an effort to stop the monthly critical mass ride. They are asking a judge to grant them an injunction enjoining "all other participants in Critical Mass bicycle rides form engaging in conduct that requires a permit without having first obtained such a permit"
This of course begs the question: does riding a bike require a permit? Critical Mass has been a feature in New York City for nearly a decade, but over the last three months the city's commitment to stopping the ride has deepened since they set their sights on riders at the August Critical Mass which coincided with the start of the Republican National Convention.
:: UPDATE :: Judge Pauley ruled today to deny the city's request for an injunction and grant the cyclists a preliminary injunction which bars the city from seizing bicycles without charging their owners with any crime. This is only the beginning, though, and there is a long road ahead.New York City filed a lawsuit today in an effort to stop the monthly Critical Mass ride. They are asking a judge to grant them an injunction enjoining "all other participants in Critical Mass bicycle rides form engaging in conduct that requires a permit without having first obtained such a permit."
This of course begs the question: does riding a bike require a permit? Critical Mass has been a feature in New York City for nearly a decade, but over the last three months the city's commitment to stopping the ride has deepened since they set their sights on riders at the August Critical Mass which coincided with the start of the Republican National Convention.
While the original suit, filed by five plaintiffs whose locks were cut and bicycles seized by the NYPD during September's Critical Mass focused very narrowly on the question of their rights to due process. They claim in their federal suit that the NYPD is violating their fifth amendment right to due process by seizing their property without charging them with any crime.
The City countered the cyclists' lawsuit with a counter suit that includes a request for an injunction to stop the ride from happening this Friday, October 29. If the judge grants the injunction, anyone who participates in Critical Mass could be found in contempt of federal court.
In their countersuit, the city denies the allegations in the original lawsuit. It's an incredibly interesting suit, and they have recourse to a lot of prior cases that involve many salient issues but few related to bicycles. The judge's ruling on this injunction is important well beyond the confines of NYC, because it is a federal case.
There are some powerful issues at stake about the rights of cyclists. This case, which started out as a very narrow demand that the city not steal bicycles may turn out to set dramatic precdent about cyclists' rights. Is it legal to require a permit for riding more than two abreast? What constitutes a parade? These questions have been answered with respect to pedestrians, but cyclists have a right to ride in city streets, and it isn't at all clear that they can be subjected to the same kinds of restrictions as pedestrians. And if they can, what of cars? Can the NYPD arrest drivers who drive in a procession? Just how different is Critical Mass from rush hour in any city?
Read the full text of the cyclists suit and the City's counter suit. the full text of the first six filings (2.6M) are available in a single file or you can read each individually:
- The Cyclists' Initial Suit (51K)
- Order to Show Cause (50K) which calls upon the City to demonstrate that they should be allowed to clip locks.
- City's Response and Counter Suit (38K) in which they argue that Critical Mass requires a permit.
- City's Formal Request for an Injunction (94K) which lays out the grounds under which they are seeking an injunction requiring a permit for future rides. Here they also argue that the NYPD does have the right to confiscate locked bicycles as abandoned property.
- Lieutenant Albano's Statement (2.4M) in which he argues that Time's Up! "fosters and organizes" the ride.
- Assistant Chief Smolka's Statement (525K) in which he explains why the NYPD needs someone to be in charge of Critical Mass.
- Memo of Law on behalf of the Cyclists (127K)in which Siegel and Hyman argue that Critical Mass isn't even illegal.
- Charles Komanoff's Statement (39K)
- Judge Pauley's Decision on the Preliminary Injunction
NYC Sues to Stop Critical Mass Bike Rides
New York City filed a lawsuit today in an effort to stop the monthly critical mass ride. They are asking a judge to grant them an injunction enjoining "all other participants in Critical Mass bicycle rides form engaging in conduct that requires a permit without having first obtained such a permit"
This of course begs the question: does riding a bike require a permit? Critical Mass has been a feature in New York City for nearly a decade, but over the last three months the city's commitment to stopping the ride has deepened since they set their sights on riders at the August Critical Mass which coincided with the start of the Republican National Convention.
:: UPDATE :: Judge Pauley ruled today to deny the city's request for an injunction and grant the cyclists a preliminary injunction which bars the city from seizing bicycles without charging their owners with any crime. This is only the beginning, though, and there is a long road ahead.New York City filed a lawsuit today in an effort to stop the monthly Critical Mass ride. They are asking a judge to grant them an injunction enjoining "all other participants in Critical Mass bicycle rides form engaging in conduct that requires a permit without having first obtained such a permit."
This of course begs the question: does riding a bike require a permit? Critical Mass has been a feature in New York City for nearly a decade, but over the last three months the city's commitment to stopping the ride has deepened since they set their sights on riders at the August Critical Mass which coincided with the start of the Republican National Convention.
While the original suit, filed by five plaintiffs whose locks were cut and bicycles seized by the NYPD during September's Critical Mass focused very narrowly on the question of their rights to due process. They claim in their federal suit that the NYPD is violating their fifth amendment right to due process by seizing their property without charging them with any crime.
The City countered the cyclists' lawsuit with a counter suit that includes a request for an injunction to stop the ride from happening this Friday, October 29. If the judge grants the injunction, anyone who participates in Critical Mass could be found in contempt of federal court.
In their countersuit, the city denies the allegations in the original lawsuit. It's an incredibly interesting suit, and they have recourse to a lot of prior cases that involve many salient issues but few related to bicycles. The judge's ruling on this injunction is important well beyond the confines of NYC, because it is a federal case.
There are some powerful issues at stake about the rights of cyclists. This case, which started out as a very narrow demand that the city not steal bicycles may turn out to set dramatic precdent about cyclists' rights. Is it legal to require a permit for riding more than two abreast? What constitutes a parade? These questions have been answered with respect to pedestrians, but cyclists have a right to ride in city streets, and it isn't at all clear that they can be subjected to the same kinds of restrictions as pedestrians. And if they can, what of cars? Can the NYPD arrest drivers who drive in a procession? Just how different is Critical Mass from rush hour in any city?
Read the full text of the cyclists suit and the City's counter suit. the full text of the first six filings (2.6M) are available in a single file or you can read each individually:
- The Cyclists' Initial Suit (51K)
- Order to Show Cause (50K) which calls upon the City to demonstrate that they should be allowed to clip locks.
- City's Response and Counter Suit (38K) in which they argue that Critical Mass requires a permit.
- City's Formal Request for an Injunction (94K) which lays out the grounds under which they are seeking an injunction requiring a permit for future rides. Here they also argue that the NYPD does have the right to confiscate locked bicycles as abandoned property.
- Lieutenant Albano's Statement (2.4M) in which he argues that Time's Up! "fosters and organizes" the ride.
- Assistant Chief Smolka's Statement (525K) in which he explains why the NYPD needs someone to be in charge of Critical Mass.
- Memo of Law on behalf of the Cyclists (127K)in which Siegel and Hyman argue that Critical Mass isn't even illegal.
- Charles Komanoff's Statement (39K)
- Judge Pauley's Decision on the Preliminary Injunction