THE MODERN STATE OF MIND & THE RADICAL METAMORPHIC REVOLUTION OF THE NERVOUS SYSTEM

1) Meta-conscious breakthrough in the historico-evolutionary + the Meta-ontology of revolutionary development of the brain. 2) Chemico-electrical + psycho-anarchical development of mentality & thought. 3) Emotional emancipation because of an extreme conscious advance. 4) The test of tests + the tests of change and time. 5) Universal theory and practice + its direct multi-dimensional concrete application > construction + its manifestation in all forms & operations. 6) The permanence of universal Meta-knowledge + its Supra-morphosis.

THE LEFT OF CAPITAL - ANTI –LEFT - ANTI-MARXISM - LENINISM - ANTI-POSTMODERNISM

A bourgeois socio-political trend – its main principle being acceptance of the estate – of all political power in general – which is regarded exclusively as an organ of the boss/workers. Characteristic features of modern Marxist-Leninism (the left + post-modernism) are acceptance of political struggle within the framework of capitalism + the denial of the immediate need for the destruction of the state. The left (Marxism & Liberalism) accepts the “need” for a state & state power for a permanent period of non-transition > from rule of the bourgeoisie to the rule of different bourgeoisie. Anti-anarchist communism emerged as a particular reflection from viewpoint of the bourgeois strata + like-minded Intellegensia –especially after the 18th - 21st centuries of bourgeoisie revolution – of the role of the party in the life of society – of the rise of various means of ideological, theoretical, moral + other kinds of methods for oppressing the people. Political & economical domination + rule of the bourgeois class = the coercion of the ruled.

Exposing the formal character of dictatorship under capitalism = bourgeois democracy = Democtatora = the rich wo/man state mainly + tendency toward total control > leading to the subjugation of society. Leftism = utopian capitalism. Being a form of political utopianism it took the class way of life to absurd reformism by accepting the state + centralism as a necessary stage for the transformation of society – from a society of bourgeois oppression to a society of oppression of the bourgeois. The difference in principle between Marxism + Anarchism is first of all that the former want to strengthen the state overnight – not understanding the condition under which the classes can be abolished. The later while aiming at the immediate creation of classless society recognize that this aim can only be achieved after the state has been abolished by the Anarcho-Social Revolution. While insisting on the strengthening of the state machinery, Marxists have clear idea of what the people will replace it with + how the latter will use its revolutionary power. They even accept that the ruling government should exercise state power + the necessity of preparing the proletariat for obedience with the bourgeois state.

The term Marxism (authoritarian communism) is trialectic – its three proponents tried to rest their theoretical construction on Hegelian ideas and idealism – on diverse dialectical theories Meta-dialectical post-materialism – even on Anarchism. Some ideologists of authoritarian communism have been obsessed and dogmatic about theory. A quite outright exposition of authoritarian communism (anti-anarchism) is Joseph Stalin – a Russian petty-bourgeois nationalist revolutionary head of party-state of the 1930s. He held that a social order of authoritarian leadership – for society & the party-state are locked in an irreconilable unity. Proceeding from collectivism Stalin accepted both the state + dictatorship + the needed for a centralized authority formation. At about the same time, the ideas of anti anarchist communism were being propounded by Lenin and Mao-Tsetung – Chinese and Russian petty-bourgeois socialists who were responsible for the term Cultural Revolution and the New Man being introduced > What is to be done > What is next > The big leap > Intellectual farmers etc. Like Stalin Mao came out for not only a state as an instrument of proletarian power but also for those bourgeois teachings that recognized the importance of centralism for the building of a new society. At the same time + in contrast to Stalin – Mao viewed the future society as being based on land reforms – on agreement between state agencies. Hence a peculiar form of Mao’s petty bourgeois despotism = “communism” = “communalism” a system of communal non-benefits.

This synthesis of community and state was nothing but a materialized petty bourgeois conception of equal classes + fair exchange of products by land workers. In the 1910s V.L.Lenin – a Russian revolutionary – a Bolshevik - who was active mostly in East-European politics, further elaborated the idea of state-communism. Kropotkin was strongly critical of Lenin & State-Communism in general. Lenin had a peculiar theory of his own – a medley of Marxism & Socialism. The chief point concerning the former is that it does regard capital – the class antagonism between capitalists + wage & un-waged workers which has risen through social development + the state as the main evil to remain. The activities of Marx & his followers showed clearly the inconsistency of state communism as an ideology for a social movement. In a word they preached full centralism – insisted on authoritarian play of disciplinary conduct + accepted the illusion for revolutionaries to organize a political party – in fact they set up a party of their own directed from the center + veered towards dictatorship. Thus the communist party was turning into bourgeois-democratic authoritarianism + even into a perfect model of back-room capitalism. At the beginning of the 21st century – Eastern Europe was swept away by state- capitalism which accepts the dictatorship role of a politico-economical party in the workers movement + regards political “struggle” & party activity as sufficient for organizing + emancipating the proletariat.

In the Western liberation movement the ideas of anti-anarchic communism did not gain much ground though they did cause it some harm – overall Euro-communism could never dissociate itself from Leninism. There was some revival of state-communism in the civil war of Spain in the course of which centralist communism degenerated into a counter-revolutionary trend. The struggle against authoritarian communism remains a necessary aspect of the Anarcho-revolutionary theory & practice and the anarcho-communist movement activities now. The experience of the modern class Meta-class struggle shows that the activities of authoritarian communist parties – relying on neo-Leninist bureaucratic precepts can cause much damage to the spontaneous Anarcho-social revolution and its movement. Bourgeois communist demands + activities by modern communists who are not averse to slandering anarchic groups – objectively play a police role for they allow the ruling regimes to turn the whole mass movement for social change into passivity + to use impotent means against it.