You are here
Announcements
Recent blog posts
- Male Sex Trade Worker
- Communities resisting UK company's open pit coal mine
- THE ANARCHIC PLANET
- The Future Is Anarchy
- The Implosion Of Capitalism And The Nation-State
- Anarchy as the true reality
- Globalization of Anarchism (Anti-Capital)
- Making Music as Social Action: The Non-Profit Paradigm
- May the year 2007 be the beginning of the end of capitalism?
- The Future is Ours Anarchic
General Intellect Mass Intellectuality
September 11, 2002 - 7:05am -- hydrarchist
General Intellect
"labour infused by the power of science, communication and language."
In any society the capacity to produce goods, ideas and relations
relates directly to the
capacities of the individuals who make up that society. As human communities
develop over time
this ability changes, correlated with the educational methods and
institutions it cultivates, the
tools developed that are accessible to the population at large, the
spaces maintained for the exchange or imparting of those skills and
the
products thereof, and vitally the nature of the distribution of all
the foregoing over the social classes which
constitute it as a group.
The consequences of the general intellect may be easily illustrated
with the aid of a historical
comparison: the encyclopedia. Four hundred years and fifty years ago
access to knowledge outside of that
relating to the local geography, history, economy and culture was
strictly limited. The printing press was
on the precipice of invention and thus the written word was circulkated
by means of manuscripts reproduced by hand.
Thus supply was limited. Knowledge was atomised due to the difficulty
and expense implicit in the
accumulation of a library. Consequently, scholars gathered nomadically
around collections, often
in monasteries, but sometimes in relatively secular settings, Oxford
for example. There the practice of
dining together, the 'commons', contained several purposes. One surely
was disciplinary, preemptively smoking out heretical research.
Another was to facilitate the sharing and exchange of information.
Scholars were know to boast
that when stummped by a particular question they need not even refer
themselves to a book; the
erudition contained in the room at dinner was adequate to resolve
even the most arcane matter.
A hundred and fifty years later, the precipitous fall in the cost
of reproducing literature provoked
by the emergence and refinement of the printing press meant not only
the mitigation of physical scarcity`
and thus the flourishing of libraries, but this in turn provided the
basis for an initial development of literacy.
Regarding knowledge itself, it allowed not only for the wide circulation
of new ideas, but also
the rediscovery of the old. When considering Diderot's launching of
the first Encyclopedia project,
it is perhaps helpful begin the reflection against the background
of this happy conjunction.
Three hundred years later, we have a new encyclopedia in construction.
Wikipedia is a volunteer produced
encyclopedia composed of more than 35,000 entries. That its appearance
was constrained until now is obvious.
Ten years ago, the commodities to allow mass participation - the pc,
modem - were not available at prices to allow their ubiquity.
Furthermore, the level of technical knowledge required to run such
systems as were in circulation precluded
the participation of many who might have been attracted to such a task.
Pralallel to our little historical example, the majority of the population
in the western world has moved from the state of peasants
to become, first wage, labouruers involved either in commodity production
or the social apparatus necessary
for its reproduction and now specialists in discrete areas of production
or, and to agreater extent,
the suppliers of services in the tertiary sector. Whilst the political
forces that imposed the need for
equitable guarantees and remuneration have evaporated, economic actors
retain the need for a workforce
capable of devising, marketting and distributing new commodities and
servies, if indeed a distinction
should be made therein. In short economic reproduction imposes the
need for innovation, and innovation
cannot be produced in the first instance by machines but rather only
by people. And this being true
at the level of product conception and commodification before giving
way to automation and the
cold economics of minimal cost mass manufacture and distribution,
it is doubly true in the area
of marketing.
Given that marketting functions on the basis of generating new needs,
carefully distinguished
from thsoe needs in which the market is already too competitive or
saturated, through a 'means
gof seduction', the magic of retail and service supply relies upon
the consumer being progressively
more sophisticated, simply so as to be able to experience the temptation,
the desire, to perceive the need.
Likewise in order to practice electronic forms of consumption the
subject must be inducted into the use
of the necessary equipment to allow them to wander through the barren
landscape nof the virtual shopping arcade.
As in advertising, where the default signifiers for all 'experiences'
are sex and escapist dreams of personla finance transcendence,
so has been the case with the drive to electronic cash register, where
get rich quick schemes aound IPOs
and the common knowledge that the network functions as a giant repository
for pornography, have not been
insignificant factors in getting people online and thereafter extending
the amount of thier day that they devote to that activity.
The evolution of the general intellect unfolds however within precise
parameters that limits this escalating
sophistication to the role of the individual as consumer, and does
not extend it the realm of general social life,
where despite exhortations to independence and personal initiative,
infantilisation is the
dominant tendency. The mechanism employed to this end is regularly
that of fear, although often it is
mere obscurantism as in the proliferation of unnecessary specialist
jargons, In concrete political
tems this translates into a tendency for the removal of decsion making
from the traditional political space of the
parliament etc. altogether and their being entrused into the hands
of bureaucrats under the guise of admininstrative orders.
This innovative force inside each of us seeks notwithstanding these
constarints to break free. This same force has
been the energy behind every utopian p[lan, every cooperative form.
On the net we see it in an extra
ordinary plurality of ways, from the assembly of massive systems of
distribution and production,
the assembly of huge archives of creative works accessible to all,
the undertaking of the new encyclopedias,
the kaleidoscope of different territoies of specialised knowledge,
the systmatic outwitting of
concentrated knowledges in the areas of security, programming. Exactly
as a resulkt of this marvellous
proliferation of individuals in community suddenly willing to assume
hugely complex tasks, the extension
of the laws of copyright, trademark and patents, the crimianlisation
of acts of exploration and examination
pose themselves as the legal fetters upon the potential to create
a new, differnet way of living today. A new form of
life defined by our collective ability to enlist one another's different
skills (communication)
for the purpose of constructing new tools and knowledge, and to do
so in circumstances which
jettison the historical pyramids of social and productive hierarchy.
A way of existing that leaves us free
to be the architects of our own life?
The concept of general intellect is pivotal today in a second and
related sense. With the end of
a productioj model in which the worker was socialised by the stability
of a workoplace environemnt
(in the sense of 'a job for life'), productive socialisation has been
diffused throughout life. The
office and manufacturing process may be micro-magnaged, subject to
intensifying surveillance, monitoring,
evaluation and alteration, but these factors are manifestations as
much of a need for control in a context
where the more abiding relationships that once disciplin ed labour
have been jettisoned.
Emotional and affective states consequent to this ubiquitous destabilisation
of the working relationship
constitute a primary matter for production, which must either be capitalised
upon or marshalled.
Inculcated precarity also generates, or exacerbates, the spectres
that haunt modern existence on a
cross-income level: depression, suicide, pathology, reliance on pharmaceuticals
or recreational
drugs to cope with everyday dissatisfaction.
The coexistence between the actualisation of the prphecy of the general
intellectet and the degraded
state of the bodies which inhabit the world reminds us that there
is no need for rapture at the
productivist accomplishments of the path of capital. Every technical
refinement integrated into
the means of production has occurred on the terms of capital and at
the expense of humanity.
Discourses of collective intelligence, linguistic production and affective
labour reduce every gesture
to the character of work, and pose the question as to whether we desire
to perciev and construct our life
on these terms. In short, the expansion of the concept of production
creates an unbounded territory
for more exploitation of life, a subordination of acts to economistic
rationales, open season for
a truely ubiquitous commodification of activity, and ultimately a
legitimation of the penetration of
the violence of the market into the most emotional and affective corners
of our being.
To state these reservations, or critique the potential conclusions
of these tendencies is not to
refute the importance of some of the collective practices that have
thusfar been described or
appropriated by this framework. Development of free software systems,
for instance, have vital
significance outside of some furnishing of proof of the capacity of
a 'multitude' to self-organise
production on the basis of its innately innovative character. Indeed,
as Eben has underlined,
the operative role of free software in the next period will be to
ensure that in the war between
users and copyright owners over appropriation the machines remain
an instrument of conflict open
to both sides.
Here, as elsewhere, the universe of possible outcomes is dictated
as much by the situation - contextualised
in terms that recognise the balance of forces - that will; determine
whether the tendency abets the
smooth restructuring of domination or escapes it, constituting a resistance
and allying itself with
other refractory elements that also escape the long arm of capitalist reproduction.
- centrality of intellectual, immaterial and communicative labour
-
see page 344 Emp.
General Intellect
"labour infused by the power of science, communication and language."
In any society the capacity to produce goods, ideas and relations relates directly to the capacities of the individuals who make up that society. As human communities develop over time this ability changes, correlated with the educational methods and institutions it cultivates, the tools developed that are accessible to the population at large, the spaces maintained for the exchange or imparting of those skills and the products thereof, and vitally the nature of the distribution of all the foregoing over the social classes which constitute it as a group.
The consequences of the general intellect may be easily illustrated with the aid of a historical comparison: the encyclopedia. Four hundred years and fifty years ago access to knowledge outside of that relating to the local geography, history, economy and culture was strictly limited. The printing press was on the precipice of invention and thus the written word was circulkated by means of manuscripts reproduced by hand. Thus supply was limited. Knowledge was atomised due to the difficulty and expense implicit in the accumulation of a library. Consequently, scholars gathered nomadically around collections, often in monasteries, but sometimes in relatively secular settings, Oxford for example. There the practice of dining together, the 'commons', contained several purposes. One surely was disciplinary, preemptively smoking out heretical research.
Another was to facilitate the sharing and exchange of information. Scholars were know to boast that when stummped by a particular question they need not even refer themselves to a book; the erudition contained in the room at dinner was adequate to resolve even the most arcane matter.
A hundred and fifty years later, the precipitous fall in the cost of reproducing literature provoked by the emergence and refinement of the printing press meant not only the mitigation of physical scarcity` and thus the flourishing of libraries, but this in turn provided the basis for an initial development of literacy. Regarding knowledge itself, it allowed not only for the wide circulation of new ideas, but also the rediscovery of the old. When considering Diderot's launching of the first Encyclopedia project, it is perhaps helpful begin the reflection against the background of this happy conjunction.
Three hundred years later, we have a new encyclopedia in construction. Wikipedia is a volunteer produced encyclopedia composed of more than 35,000 entries. That its appearance was constrained until now is obvious. Ten years ago, the commodities to allow mass participation - the pc, modem - were not available at prices to allow their ubiquity. Furthermore, the level of technical knowledge required to run such systems as were in circulation precluded the participation of many who might have been attracted to such a task.
Pralallel to our little historical example, the majority of the population in the western world has moved from the state of peasants to become, first wage, labouruers involved either in commodity production or the social apparatus necessary for its reproduction and now specialists in discrete areas of production or, and to agreater extent, the suppliers of services in the tertiary sector. Whilst the political forces that imposed the need for equitable guarantees and remuneration have evaporated, economic actors retain the need for a workforce capable of devising, marketting and distributing new commodities and servies, if indeed a distinction should be made therein. In short economic reproduction imposes the need for innovation, and innovation cannot be produced in the first instance by machines but rather only by people. And this being true at the level of product conception and commodification before giving way to automation and the cold economics of minimal cost mass manufacture and distribution, it is doubly true in the area of marketing.
Given that marketting functions on the basis of generating new needs, carefully distinguished from thsoe needs in which the market is already too competitive or saturated, through a 'means gof seduction', the magic of retail and service supply relies upon the consumer being progressively more sophisticated, simply so as to be able to experience the temptation, the desire, to perceive the need. Likewise in order to practice electronic forms of consumption the subject must be inducted into the use of the necessary equipment to allow them to wander through the barren landscape nof the virtual shopping arcade. As in advertising, where the default signifiers for all 'experiences' are sex and escapist dreams of personla finance transcendence, so has been the case with the drive to electronic cash register, where get rich quick schemes aound IPOs and the common knowledge that the network functions as a giant repository for pornography, have not been insignificant factors in getting people online and thereafter extending the amount of thier day that they devote to that activity.
The evolution of the general intellect unfolds however within precise parameters that limits this escalating sophistication to the role of the individual as consumer, and does not extend it the realm of general social life, where despite exhortations to independence and personal initiative, infantilisation is the dominant tendency. The mechanism employed to this end is regularly that of fear, although often it is mere obscurantism as in the proliferation of unnecessary specialist jargons, In concrete political tems this translates into a tendency for the removal of decsion making from the traditional political space of the parliament etc. altogether and their being entrused into the hands of bureaucrats under the guise of admininstrative orders.
This innovative force inside each of us seeks notwithstanding these constarints to break free. This same force has been the energy behind every utopian p[lan, every cooperative form. On the net we see it in an extra ordinary plurality of ways, from the assembly of massive systems of distribution and production, the assembly of huge archives of creative works accessible to all, the undertaking of the new encyclopedias, the kaleidoscope of different territoies of specialised knowledge, the systmatic outwitting of concentrated knowledges in the areas of security, programming. Exactly as a resulkt of this marvellous proliferation of individuals in community suddenly willing to assume hugely complex tasks, the extension of the laws of copyright, trademark and patents, the crimianlisation of acts of exploration and examination pose themselves as the legal fetters upon the potential to create a new, differnet way of living today. A new form of life defined by our collective ability to enlist one another's different skills (communication) for the purpose of constructing new tools and knowledge, and to do so in circumstances which jettison the historical pyramids of social and productive hierarchy. A way of existing that leaves us free to be the architects of our own life?
The concept of general intellect is pivotal today in a second and related sense. With the end of a productioj model in which the worker was socialised by the stability of a workoplace environemnt (in the sense of 'a job for life'), productive socialisation has been diffused throughout life. The office and manufacturing process may be micro-magnaged, subject to intensifying surveillance, monitoring, evaluation and alteration, but these factors are manifestations as much of a need for control in a context where the more abiding relationships that once disciplin ed labour have been jettisoned.
Emotional and affective states consequent to this ubiquitous destabilisation of the working relationship constitute a primary matter for production, which must either be capitalised upon or marshalled. Inculcated precarity also generates, or exacerbates, the spectres that haunt modern existence on a cross-income level: depression, suicide, pathology, reliance on pharmaceuticals or recreational drugs to cope with everyday dissatisfaction.
The coexistence between the actualisation of the prphecy of the general intellectet and the degraded state of the bodies which inhabit the world reminds us that there is no need for rapture at the productivist accomplishments of the path of capital. Every technical refinement integrated into the means of production has occurred on the terms of capital and at the expense of humanity. Discourses of collective intelligence, linguistic production and affective labour reduce every gesture to the character of work, and pose the question as to whether we desire to perciev and construct our life on these terms. In short, the expansion of the concept of production creates an unbounded territory for more exploitation of life, a subordination of acts to economistic rationales, open season for a truely ubiquitous commodification of activity, and ultimately a legitimation of the penetration of the violence of the market into the most emotional and affective corners of our being.
To state these reservations, or critique the potential conclusions of these tendencies is not to refute the importance of some of the collective practices that have thusfar been described or appropriated by this framework. Development of free software systems, for instance, have vital significance outside of some furnishing of proof of the capacity of a 'multitude' to self-organise production on the basis of its innately innovative character. Indeed, as Eben has underlined, the operative role of free software in the next period will be to ensure that in the war between users and copyright owners over appropriation the machines remain an instrument of conflict open to both sides.
Here, as elsewhere, the universe of possible outcomes is dictated as much by the situation - contextualised in terms that recognise the balance of forces - that will; determine whether the tendency abets the smooth restructuring of domination or escapes it, constituting a resistance and allying itself with other refractory elements that also escape the long arm of capitalist reproduction.
- centrality of intellectual, immaterial and communicative labour - see page 344 Emp.